The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Florida Panther Habitat Use: New Approach to an Old Problem
Abstract
Although the Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi) has a history of study spanning more than 2 decades, some researchers have criticized previous habitat analyses of the panther for using daytime telemetry locations to infer 24-hour habitat use, selective use of radiotagged animals, comparison of animal locations to an inappropriate set of available resources, use of land cover maps for time periods that poorly matched some animal locations, use of locations instead of the individual animal as the sampling unit, and failure to account for telemetry error. To address all but the first of these concerns, we analyzed over 57,000 radiolocations of 100 Florida panthers and 8 introduced Texas cougars (Puma concolor stanlyana) collected from 1981 to 2003 using a Euclidean distance-based analysis (EDA), a technique that measures linear distances between telemetry locations and habitat types to determine nonrandom habitat use. We matched panther locations to 1 of 3 land cover maps reflecting cover conditions spanning 23 years to determine second- and third-order habitat selection. Panthers selected a mosaic of habitats when establishing a home range, and selected forests and avoided open wetlands within their home range. We recommend that managers give forests highest consideration when conserving this endangered species and suggest the further evaluation of the habitat value of natural openings that occur in close proximity to forested panther range.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“3 were second order selection analyses (home ranges within the range) [6, 7, 10]”
From Landscape Analysis of Adult Florida Panther Habitat (2015) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“the majority of these analyses were third order selections (habitat within home ranges) [4–9]”
From Landscape Analysis of Adult Florida Panther Habitat (2015) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“and in south Florida forested habitats have been shown to be important to panthers [4–9, 38], although it is topographically flat [39].”
From Landscape Analysis of Adult Florida Panther Habitat (2015) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Previous studies also found that panthers selected cypress swamps [6, 7].”
From Landscape Analysis of Adult Florida Panther Habitat (2015) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“However, upland forests ranked high in habitats selected within panther home ranges [6–9].”
From Landscape Analysis of Adult Florida Panther Habitat (2015) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cites
Effects of Sample Size on Kernel Home Range Estimates
Seaman, D. E., Millspaugh, J. J., Kernohan, B. J., Brundige, G. C., Raedeke, K. J., & Gitzen, R. A. (1999) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802664 · Cited by 1,390 · cited 1×
“We excluded from the data 1) locations of individuals ,18 months old due to potential habitat-use biases (i.e., their locations would be subsets of their mothers); 2) individuals with ,50 locations (Seaman et al. 1999; panther ID nos.”
MethodFlorida Panther Habitat Use in Response to Prescribed Fire
Dees, C. S., Clark, J. D., & Manen, F. T. V. (2001) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3803287 · Cited by 59 · cited 1×
“Mean estimated telemetry error ranged from 77–230 m (Belden et al. 1988, Dees et al. 2001).”
BackgroundPanther Habitat Use in Southern Florida
Belden, R. C., Frankenberger, W. B., McBride, R. T., & Schwikert, S. T. (1988) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3800927 · Cited by 58 · cited 2×
“Mean estimated telemetry error ranged from 77–230 m (Belden et al. 1988, Dees et al. 2001).”
BackgroundResult
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- Aebischer, 1993, Ecology, 74, 1313
- Beier, 2003, An analysis of scientific literature related to the Florida panther. Final report
- Belden, 1988, Journal of Wildlife Management, 52, 660
- Comiskey, 2002, Panthers and forests in south Florida: an ecological perspective. Conservation Ecology 6(1):18
- Conner, 2001, Radio telemetry and animal populations, 275, 10.1016/B978-012497781-5/50011-6 · DOI
- Conner, 2003, Ecology, 84, 526
- Craighead, 1971, The trees of south Florida. Volume 1
- Dees, 2001, Journal of Wildlife Management, 65, 141
- Dixon, 1982, Wild mammals of North America, 711
- Duever, 1986, The Big Cypress National Preserve
- Hela, 1952, Bulletin of Marine Science of the Gulf and Caribbean, 2, 438
- Hooge, 2000, Animal movement extension to Arcview. Version 2.0. Alaska Biological Science Center, U.S
- Johnson, 1980, Ecology, 61, 65
- Kautz, 1998, Florida Scientist, 61, 171
- Kautz, 1993, Florida Scientist, 56, 135
- Land, 2000, Endangered Species Update, 17, 100
- Loveless, 1959, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission Technical Bulletin, 6, 1
- Maehr, 1997a, The Florida panther: life and death of a vanishing carnivore
- Maehr, 1997b, Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History, 40, 1
- Maehr, 1990, Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Southeastern Fish and Wildlife Agencies, 44, 310
- Maehr, 2002, Biological Conservation, 106, 187
- Meegan, 2002, Southeastern Naturalist, 1, 217
- Neu, 1974, Journal of Wildlife Management, 38, 541
- Pearlstine, 1995, Conservation Biology, 9, 1020
- Perkins, 2004, Journal of Wildlife Management, 68, 509
- Robertson, 1955, An analysis of the breeding-bird populations of tropical Florida in relation to the vegetation
- Robertson, 1959, Everglades—the park story
- Seaman, 1999, Journal of Wildlife Management, 63, 739
- Severinghaus, 1956, The deer of North America, 57
- Stys, 2004, Florida vegetation and land cover derived from 2003 Landsat ETM+ imagery
- Trewartha, 1943, An introduction to weather and climate
- Wade, 1980, Fire in south Florida ecosystems. U.S, 10.2737/SE-GTR-17 · DOI
- Worton, 1989, Ecology, 70, 164
- Young, 1946, The puma: mysterious American cat
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smoldering Combustion and Ground Fires: Ecological Effects and Multi-Scale Significance
Watts, A. C., & Kobziar, L. N. (2013) · Fire Ecology · doi:10.4996/fireecology.0901124 · Cited by 118
“In southern Florida, for example, two federally listed endangered species (the wood stork, Mycteria americana, and the Florida panther, Felis concolor coryi) may depend on the existence of standing water late in the region’s dry season (Fleming et al. 1994, Cox et al. 2006, Benson et al. 2008).”
BackgroundBenson, J. F. (2012) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12006 · Cited by 72
Vehicle-related mortality and road crossing behavior of the Florida panther
Schwab, A. C., & Zandbergen, P. A. (2010) · Applied Geography · doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.10.015 · Cited by 78
“In a more recent re-analysis of the historic panther diurnal telemetry data Cox et al. (2006) have reaffirmed the importance of forests for Florida panthers when establishing a home range and selecting habitats within them.”
BackgroundCarver, S., Bevins, S. N., Lappin, M. R., Boydston, E. E., Lyren, L. M., Alldredge, M. W., Logan, K. A., Sweanor, L. L., Riley, S. P. D., Serieys, L. E. K., et al. (2015) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/15-0445 · Cited by 69
“Their increased exposure in these areas may be due to greater intraspecific contact (Cox et al. 2006, Burdett et al. 2010).”
Hart, K. M., Cherkiss, M., Smith, B. J., Mazzotti, F., Fujisaki, I., Snow, R., & Dorcas, M. (2015) · Animal Biotelemetry · doi:10.1186/s40317-015-0022-2 · Cited by 55
“For example, in ENP, wood storks (Mycteria americana), Florida panthers (Puma concolor coryi), and Cape Sable seaside sparrows (Ammodramus maritimus mirabilis) are species of conservation concern that have home ranges proximal to the common-use areas of radio-tracked pythons [45-47].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- COX, J. J., MAEHR, D. S., & LARKIN, J. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Indiana University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- COX, JOHN J.
- Venue
- Journal of Wildlife Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1778-1785
- ISSN
- 0022-541X (ISSN-L)
- 1937-2817
- OpenAlex
- W2174203451
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Wildlife Management (publishedVersion)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Park Service
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Keywords
- Florida panther, Puma concolor coryi, habitat use, habitat selection, home range, radiolocation, land cover, forest habitat, endangered species conservation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Florida Panther Habitat Use: New Approach to an Old Problem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70%5B1778:fphuna%5D2.0.co;2
- The paper
- COX, J. J., MAEHR, D. S., & LARKIN, J. L. (2006). Florida Panther Habitat Use: New Approach to an Old Problem. Journal of Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70%5B1778%3Afphuna%5D2.0.co%3B2